Getty Images (2)
Danielle Staub’s lawyer tells HollywoodLife.com exclusively that Danielle plans legal action against Teresa Giudice and Jacqueline Laurita’s daughter Ashley Holmes, among others, for their wild attack on Danielle, which featured on last night’s ‘RHONJ’ episode.
Hell hath no fury like Danielle Staub attacked by a pack of raging Housewives!
The star of The Real Housewives of New Jersey is still furious over the November attack that left her emotionally bruised and with one less hair extension.
We told you earlier about the July 12 episode documenting the ridiculous and almost gang like fight instigated by Teresa Giudice, which ended with Jacqueline Laurita’s 19-year-old daughter Ashley Holmes ripping out Danielle’s hair. But HollywoodLife.com can exclusively reveal that Danielle is suing the women involved at the superior court in Passaic County, NJ.
“I’ve never seen anything like this,” says Danielle’s defense attorney Paul Giblin. “We are going to use this footage and prepare a case against these women. We are seeking assault and battery charges, defamation of character and punitive damages as well.”
But that’s not all: Paul is going to do everything he can to make sure that Danielle remains safe from the other housewives.
“We will get restraining orders by the judge against Teresa, Ashley and all others involved. We will subpoena this women to make sure they come to court. We are going to ask to impose sanctions against these women, whatever the law allows.”
i’ve been an attorney for almost 50 years — every majori’ve never seen anything like this they are so explosive and so negative — is it over no it’s not over i don’t know that it will ever be over. danielle is a nice deep thinking thoughtful generous kind considerate for whatever reason constant baiting –no court date — we are going to use that footage and prepare the case against them. we feel that we will be successful. No question about the assault and battery and issues of defamation and character. Ashley and Teresa — just a law suit seeking punitive damages but others as well. restraining orders — the judge — probably in the next few weeks — i don’t know when the judge will hear but –we will supine them –these things don’t end with paying a finewe are going to ask for the most punitive whatever the law allows us to restrain her and impose sanctions against her we will do.there is freedom of speech amendment can you restrain someone for saying things but it’s the intent behind it — is this fueling some of the work behind this people. some kind of conspiracy it’s like a gang mentality.superior court in passaic country highest court in the country –Paul Giblin criminal defense attorney — Bob CherryAshley appeared in court back in January but got off with a $189 fine.
“These things don’t end with paying a fine,” says Paul. “It’s not over … I don’t know when this will ever be over. There is a freedom of speech amendment so we can’t restrain Teresa for saying things but it’s the intent behind it. This is fueling some of the work behind these people. This is some kind of conspiracy, it’s like a gang mentality.”
No comments:
Post a Comment